A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around C’s 22:50 on October 2, 2015; (b) around C’s 112, while under the influence of alcohol, and was called out after receiving a report at around 112; (c) a slope E of the branch police station D’s police box belonging to the branch police station; and (d) a police officer F’s attempt to have the Defendant return to the taxi; and (c) “C’s feasia,” the Defendant was called out,

C I wish to be impule;

They have inevitably expressed the desire to be "," and therefore, they interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the handling of reports by 112, taking the face of E once a week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (as to the statement of an excursion ship by a shot person):

1. Application of video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: one month to five years; and

2. Where the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] is minor in the area of mitigation (one month to eight months), the area of mitigation (a person with special mitigation) (a person with special mitigation) of public duties, and the extent of violence, intimidation, and deceptive schemes;

3. Determination of sentence: The sentence shall be determined like the order, taking into consideration all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of this case, such as four months of imprisonment, the fact that the defendant for two years of suspended sentence is divided into his own crimes, the fact that he has no previous convictions, the degree of interference with the execution of official duties and the fact that the degree