1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 5, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Intellectual Property Tribunal for an affirmative trial to confirm the scope of right by asserting that the instant petition is subject to the Plaintiff’s utility model registration B (hereinafter “instant petition”). Accordingly, the Defendant asserted that the instant petition falls under the scope of right by a person with ordinary knowledge in the relevant technical field (hereinafter “ordinary technician”) as it falls under the prior petition and the free-to-art technology that can be easily implemented from widely known and widely known art, and that it does not fall under the scope of right within the registered petition of this case. 2) On August 27, 2015, the Intellectual Property Tribunal deliberated on the instant petition with the Intellectual Property Tribunal under the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 2015Da3437, Aug. 27, 2015, and applied for an affirmative trial to confirm the scope of right by easily employing the art widely known to the person with ordinary knowledge in the prior petition No. 2. 1 and the instant claim No. 1 of this case’s petition is not subject to the instant petition No.

B. The title of the instant registered device (Evidence 2) 1: C2) filing date/registration date/registration number: D/E/B 3: Plaintiff 1’s technical field concerns mobile phone protection cases in which the instant registered device pertains to a mobile phone protection case that covers a mobile phone from external shock or the infiltration of foreign substance, etc., and is more detailed, more convenient, convenient, convenient, convenient and convenient, and solid, combined with the front coverer who covers the rear bank and the front bank.

(Liet No. (001) 2.