The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The fact-finding defendant cut 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the cultivation of this case, but did not cut 9.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the court below's decision on the assertion of mistake of facts were duly adopted and examined. ① The victim cultivated the Red Sea 1, 2, 3, 7, and 9 of the instant model, and the other Dual Sea 1, 2, 3, 9 of the instant model, and the Defendant inspected and repaired the products contained in the instant model. ② The victim appeared Daber G from July 28, 2013 to July 31, 2013, 1 to 5-6 of 144 of 200, 7-2 of 200, 9 of 200, 3000, 9 of 9 of 9 of 200, 3000, 4 of 9 of 9 of 12 of 2 of 30,000 as a witness of the police investigation, and 4 of 9 of 9 of 30,000,000 of 9 of 3 of 3 of 3 of 3.

“The statement to the effect that “” is: (4) the heading of 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the plantation of this case is deemed to have cut the brue form or location of the brue, or to have cut the brue by other fishing vessels, and the Defendant artificially cut the respective parts of Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 7, which are different from the brue, by other fishing vessels, and the brue is also recognized to have cut the parts of 1, 2, 3, and 7, which are the knife of the 9 grue.