The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the fact that a person who suffered from the summary of the grounds of appeal appears to be an investment whose high profit and principal are promised to guarantee the defendant, and that at the time the defendant was unable to return the principal even if he received the above money, the defendant could be found to have obtained by deceiving the victim on April 21, 2008, and by deceiving it of KRW 100 million, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous, which affected the conclusion of the remaining judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was known to the Defendant through insurance business around 2007 or around 2008, and then, the Defendant is an expert who works for Samsung Bio-resources for a long time.

There are many people who know about high-class information around.

Financial design may be made as a tech specialist, and an investment may be made high-income.

“At the end of a series of times”, on April 14, 2008, the amount of KRW 710 million has been delivered from the injured party as an investment in stocks and futures trading, and then the next day has been affixed 2008.

4. 15. The full amount was returned to the victim at the victim’s request.

The defendant may continuously punish the victim with money if he/she has invested.

The interest equivalent to 7% per annum, which is the interest rate of the Maspbook, shall be paid monthly.

“.....”

However, on June 4, 2007, the Defendant entered into a stock transaction with a share security loan of an amount equivalent to KRW 1 billion, but incurred losses. On June 4, 2007, the Defendant received an investment of KRW 1 billion from a third party around June 4, 2007, and the Defendant additionally invested approximately KRW 600 million, which was created separately by the Defendant, and thereafter traded shares with a share security loan of more than KRW 1.5 billion as security. From January 2008 to March 17, 2008, the Defendant received an additional investment of KRW 50 million from a third party and received an investment of KRW 50 million from a third party and traded shares as security, but around April 3, 2008, the Defendant traded shares with a share security loan.