beta
Text
The judgment below
Of the above, the part of collection against Defendant B shall be reversed.
Defendant
46,841,750 won shall be collected from B.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A1’s defense counsel of Defendant A of the erroneous determination of facts alleged that: (a) with respect to the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), Defendant A’s defense counsel of August 22, 2018, the first trial date and the first trial date of July 9, 2018, the first trial of the appeal and the trial of the court of first instance only delivered money to Defendant B after he stated that he would make an investment in the “T” as stated in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court below (2018Da1206); (b) Defendant A did not have invested money in the “T”; and (c) Defendant A’s defense counsel’s opinion and the third trial date of the trial of the first instance on August 22, 2018 clearly withdrawn the aforementioned mistake of facts, and even ex officio there is no reason for Defendant A to receive KRW 2,00,000 from Defendant B.
B) Defendant A is in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) 2-D 2 of the judgment of the lower court (2018 Godan1206)
2) The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment, fines of 200,000, additional charges of 10,000,000, additional charges of 10,000,000) is too unreasonable and unreasonable.
B. Defendant B (unfairly unfair) defense counsel in Defendant B asserted that Defendant B did not deliver KRW 2,00,000 to Defendant B in the defense counsel’s opinion on October 18, 2018. However, since this was made after the lapse of the period for submitting the statement of grounds of appeal, it does not constitute a legitimate grounds for appeal, and even if ex officio examination is made, it does not constitute a legitimate ground for appeal, as seen in Article 3-A (1). The lower court’s imprisonment (one year and six months, additional collection amounting to KRW 97,432,50) is too unreasonable. C. misunderstanding of facts against Defendant C1.