Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on January 12, 2008 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1 million at the Suwon Friwon on March 7, 2008), drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on June 29, 2009 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Suwon Friwon on November 6, 2009), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on April 11, 201 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 5 million at the Suwon Friwon Friwon on April 30, 201), and violates Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On April 3, 2018, the Defendant driven B in the state of alcohol alcohol content of about 0.073% from the 1.5 km section from the Gansa Hospital funeral parking lot located in the Simk Kim-dong of the Simn-si to the next road of the Kando Information High School located in the Simn-si of the Simn-si to the Goan Information High School located in the Simn-si of the Simn-si of the Simn-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Flags used for measuring instruments of drinking;

1. Records of judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, summary order, and other Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the crime of this case is that the defendant, who has had a record of driving a drinking not less than twice in the case of the crime of this case, once or more, drives a second alcohol, and the nature of the crime is not exceptionally applied.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, that the defendant was found to have been driven by drinking in 208, 2009, and 2013 passed 10 years, 9 years, and 5 years, respectively from the date of the crime of this case in 2008, 2009, and 2013, and that the amount of alcohol concentration in blood due to drinking of this case is not a high figure, and the punishment shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, and result of the crime, etc.