logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.02 2017가단218089
근저당권말소
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuits, the Suyang District Court of the Republic of Korea (Seoul District Court of the Republic of Korea) Branch Office of the Republic of Korea (Seoul District Court of the Republic of Korea), the receipt of September 2, 2008 No. 6360

Reasons

1. The description corresponding to the above defendant among the grounds for the attachment to the indication of the claim;

2. Grounds;

(a) Judgment made based on the recommendation of confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. If the registration of the establishment of a new mortgage was made ex officio, the request for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a new mortgage is sufficient if only the transferee seeks cancellation of the registration of the establishment. The additional registration prior to the establishment of a new mortgage is subordinate to the registration of the establishment of the existing principal registry, and thus, the registration of the establishment of a new mortgage is dismissed as it is not appropriate for the Plaintiff to seek cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a new principal registry when the registration of the establishment of a new principal registry is revoked, or when the registration of the establishment of a new principal registry is null and void, it is only necessary for the principal registry to cancel the registration of the establishment of a new principal registry when the registration of the establishment of a new principal registry is revoked separately (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Da7550, May 26, 1995). Therefore, it is inappropriate for the Plaintiff to seek cancellation of the additional registration of the

arrow