logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.06.30 2016가단4420
면책확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's defendant with respect to the decision of performance recommendation rendered by the 2007Gau 7603, the Wolsu-si court of the Gwangju District Court's 2007Gau.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On May 24, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for bankruptcy and immunity with the Gwangju District Court Decision 2010Hadan2361, 2010Ma2361 and 2010Ma2361, and was granted immunity on October 20, 201, and the said decision became final and conclusive around that time.

B. In the above case of bankruptcy and immunity, the Plaintiff omitted the Defendant’s obligation to Nonparty C’s guaranteed obligation, which is the Defendant’s obligation on the list of creditors exempted from immunity at the time of immunity, but this omitted due to a cause not attributable to the Plaintiff (at the time, the Defendant’s claim was not known). This does not necessarily cause the Defendant to have any intentional omission on the list of creditors, and thus, it is sought to confirm that the Defendant’s obligation to the Defendant and other obligations, including damages, were discharged pursuant to Article 423 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act.

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow