1. The defendant shall receive KRW 130,000,000 from the plaintiff, and at the same time the plaintiff shall be 3,207 square meters prior to the Seoul Special Self-Governing Province.

1. Determination as to the cause of the instant claim

A. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, 12, and 13 (including each number), witness D, and E's testimony as a whole.

(1) Nonparty 1 F (hereinafter “the deceased”) included five children, including male, G, B, E, and H. However, the Defendant is the third male, and the Plaintiff is the wife of H in the Plaintiff.

(2) On February 1964, the deceased died and made a will to the effect that the land of this case was transferred to H on the ground that there is a concern about the future of H in the age of his age at the time.

(3) However, as at the time, H was not able to complete the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the above H with respect to the instant land as a minor relation, and instead, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Do, South and North Korea as of July 30, 1984.

(4) However, as D failed to carry out its business and its creditors are highly likely to carry out compulsory execution against the land of this case, D completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land of this case in the future of the defendant, who is a dynamic who is relatively re-existent as of September 10, 1986.

(5) On the other hand, after leaving the workplace when the Plaintiff was on the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff purchased 3,782 square meters around 1, 2007, around October 26, 2007, from the her husband, for the purpose of living an electric source in the vicinity of the instant land, the Plaintiff agreed to purchase the instant land in the form of purchasing the said land by giving KRW 150 million to the Defendant and selling it in the form of purchasing the said land. In addition, around May 18, 2014, in order to receive the return of the instant land that H received from the Defendant from the Defendant, the Plaintiff, the wife of H, upon taking into account the fact that there was money not repaid after borrowing from the Defendant during the previous business process of H, the Plaintiff, the wife of H, agreed to receive the return in the form of purchasing the said land.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant trade agreement”). (6) The latter.