1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following dismissal or addition and new determination. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Each of the 2nd 8th 2th 2th 8th 8th 3th 18th 18th 3th 18th 2th 3th 3th 3th 3rd 4th 100

The 4th parallel 16th parallel "Defendant (Appointed Party) and designated parties" are "Defendant (Appointed Party), designated parties, and Defendant D."

The 5th 6th 6th 10 parallels are as follows.

“C. Therefore, the Plaintiff, along with the payment of the amount equivalent to the delivery of each shop of this case, the amount equivalent to the monthly rent or the amount equivalent to the monthly rent or the amount equivalent to 25 to 60 days, sought to pay damages for delay equivalent to 99% per annum from the special damage of the lost profit on the daily rent or the amount corresponding to the daily rent or the amount equivalent to 99% per annum from the primary rent, and the conjunctive claim only sought payment of the aforementioned delivery and the amount of monthly rent or the amount corresponding to the above provisional claim (However, the preliminary claim must have a relationship that is incompatible with the primary claim. As such, the claim to reduce the primary claim partially in quantity with the same cause as to the object identical to the primary claim is a primary claim, and cannot be deemed as a genuine preliminary claim in the lawsuit.

. The number of pages 5 and 19 of the "Selection F" is expressed as the "Selection F and Defendant D".

8. At the end of the 7th parallel, the following shall be added to the contents of the 8th parallel:

"However, the plaintiff claims that the rate of delay damages should be increased to 99% per annum on the ground that the court claims damages for the amount equivalent to the rent or the rent, etc. among the main claims, but it cannot be deemed a new claim by changing the rate of delay damages."

3. The part to be newly determined is that Defendant D does not dispute the Plaintiff’s claim.