The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:20 on the instant facts charged: (b) around 02:20, the Defendant: (c) within the main point of “C” located in Ma-si B; (b) the victim D did not have any contact with the victim; (c) the victim D’s inside of the victim D, who continued to be drinking and drinking; (d) the victim D’s inside and outside of the victim D, sold the victim E several times of drinking and launching; and (e) the victim E, who was working for the victim D, sold the victim E’s inside and telegraph of the victim E.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code. According to the non-written application or investigation report (the victim's confirmation report) bound in the trial records, it can be acknowledged that the victims expressed their intention not to be punished against the defendant after filing the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.