(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.03.19 2013고단2013

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.03.19 2013고단2013

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 2013"

1. On March 2010, the Defendant related to the lending company: (a) concluded that “The Defendant shall pay the victim KRW 30,000-40,000 to 40,000,000,000 to the lender. However, if the Defendant sent a certificate of personal seal impression, a copy of resident registration certificate, etc. to obtain a loan under the name of the lender, he/she will receive the loan and pay it well.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a certain amount of income with bad credit standing at the time, and was in very difficult economic situation due to a large amount of other debts, so even if he received a loan under the name of the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and interest of the loan properly

Around March 31, 2010, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained a certificate of personal seal impression and resident registration certificate from the victim; and (c) obtained a loan from the victim under the name of the victim; and (d) obtained a loan of KRW 3,000,000 each in the name of the victim; and (b) obtained a loan of KRW 1,500,000 from the Lone Star Loan and the Infant Together Loan Co., Ltd. around July 4, 201 in the same manner, around July 16, 2011; and (c) obtained a total of KRW 7,00,000 from the Hyundai Swiss Savings Bank; and (d) obtained a loan of KRW 18,50,000 in the name of each of the victims.

2. On November 2010, the Defendant related to credit card fraud concluded that “The Defendant would temporarily use the credit card to loan it to the victim and pay the price properly at the instant coffee shop in which he/she was employed as a patrolman on November 2010.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price properly even when using the victim's credit card because the defendant was economically difficult.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim to do so.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단1695

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.06.26 2015고단430

-창원지방법원 2013.10.29 2012고단2956

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.04.11 2013고단1928

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.02 2017고정122