The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; (b) around July 18, 2016, the fact that the Defendant was inside the “C” sugar room located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (c) despite the absence of the fact that the victim D has stolen the Defendant’s arms; (d) however, the victim was her victim on the spot where three persons, such as E, are heard; and (d) the female she was

The same shall apply to those women who have sold them.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. The instant case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement of non-written application for the preparation of a victim D, which is bound in the records, the victim can be acknowledged facts that expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on March 9, 2017, which was after the instant indictment was instituted. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.