The defendant shall be innocent.

1. From March 16, 2012 to December 23, 2012, the Defendant, as the president of C Apartments' representative meeting, posted a printed article stating that “the victim D, E (the victim) will hold a meeting to leave without permission, and to leave without permission” on the bulletin board in the above apartment site, thereby impairing the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The alleged defendant is not the chief of the management office, and the defendant denies the above facts charged.

B. Therefore, as to whether the defendant posted the above inducement, the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant prepared by the judicial police officer is denied in this court, and thus, it is not admissible as evidence, and the statement of the witness E's statement, D and E in the third protocol of trial alone is insufficient to recognize the above charges, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(A) According to the witness E’s statement, the witness E goes to work in the management office on March 16, 2012 and takes the contents of the above inducements. In other words, the witness E, the chairperson of the council of occupants’ representatives, called the phone, followed the above contents. However, according to the result of this court’s inquiry about Montreal Telecom, E Telecom, E Telecom, and Stock Company K, the above facts are recognized only to have been called the Defendant’s cell phone at around 10:50 on March 21, 2012, and unlike E, it is difficult to believe E’s statement as it is without any data that it was called to the Defendant by his cell phone or management office phone at around 10:50 on March 16, 2012.