1. All of the actions of the Plaintiff A, B, D, F, G, H, I, J, and K shall be dismissed.

2. On February 10, 201, the Defendant is between L/L and L/L market.

1. Details of ruling;

A. On December 11, 2009, L filed an application for permission to convert a mountainous district for the purpose of creating a site for a detached house with respect to a total of 3,968 square meters of land in the Y and N, and also filed an application for permission to convert a mountainous district for the purpose of creating a site for a detached house with respect to a total of 5 square meters of land in the foregoing O, P, Q, R, and S, which are part of the five lots of land as shown in the attached Table 1 list, for the purpose of creating a site for the said detached house site.

B. On January 26, 2010, the Silsung Market rejected an application for permission for the diversion of the said mountainous district on the grounds that Article 18 of the Mountainous Districts Management Act and Article 20(4) [Attachment 4] subparagraph 1(e) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act were violated, L withdraws withdraws the application for permission for the said development activities, while filing a lawsuit seeking revocation of the said disposition on March 17, 2010, Suwon District Court 2010Guhap3689.

C. On August 23, 2010, L, for which the lawsuit for revocation was pending, submitted an application for permission for conversion of a mountainous district with the content that reduces the exclusive use area for the creation of the said housing site into 1,732 square meters to 1,732 square meters, and an application for permission for development of the same content

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant application” and the land subject to the said permission is referred to as the “instant application”). D.

On August 26, 2010, the court recommended mediation to the effect that “the ignified Mayor shall permit the conversion of a mountainous district to the reduced area and withdraw L shall file the above lawsuit (hereinafter “instant recommendation”),” which accepted this recommendation, and withdrawn L’s lawsuit when the chemical market permits conversion of a mountainous district to the reduced area.

E. However, with respect to the instant application, the chemical market on October 6, 2010 is in excess of 50 meters at the time when the instant application is based on the 25m radius, the base table for the place of application in this case, and thus, the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter referred to as the “National Land Planning and Utilization Act”).

Article 58 (3) of this Act and Article 56 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.