The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (based on factual errors or misapprehension of legal principles) lies in the fact of fighting the body of the victim and the body of the victim, such as where the victim, who is a taxi engineer, was placed in a fluor and fluor due to the problem of taxi charges, and fluoring fluoring with the victim, but there is no intentional injury on the part of the victim when the victim’s face and chest are fluored

The Defendant’s act does not constitute a assault, but constitutes a justifiable act even if the Defendant’s act was an assault, inasmuch as it was a assault. The Defendant’s act constitutes a legitimate act.

Since the injury suffered by the victim was caused by adding the instant fighting match to the king, it is difficult to see that the injury of the victim was caused by the Defendant’s act. Even if the causal relationship is acknowledged between the Defendant’s act and the injury inflicted on the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent to commit assault or injure the victim at the time of the instant case, and thus, the crime of injury

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피고인은 공소사실 기재 일시ㆍ장소에서 피해자와 실랑이를 벌이던 중 피해자를 2회 바닥에 넘어뜨렸는데, 피고인이 피해자를 첫 번째 넘어뜨릴 때에는 피해자를 뿌리치는 과정에서 피해자를 밀어 넘어뜨리게 된 것으로 보이나(피고인과 피해자가 서로 밀고 당기던 중 피해자가 중심을 잃으면서 엉덩방아를 찧은 측면도 있어 보인다), 피고인이 피해자를 두 번째 넘어뜨릴 때에는 적극적으로 피고인의 팔로 피해자의 중심을 무너뜨린 다음 피해자를 강하게 밀었고 이에 피해자가 엉덩방아를 찧으면서 차도 바닥에 넘어진 점, ② 차도...