1. The defendant's money stated in the "Difference" column in the attached Table 2 to the plaintiffs, and each corresponding money;

A. Plaintiff B and C

1. Details of ruling;

A. On June 20, 2013, the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the authorization to implement the “A Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project” implemented by the Defendant pursuant to Article 28 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017).

Seongbuk-gu Public Notice AA). (b)

In order to acquire each land, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “land, etc. to be expropriated in this case”) indicated in attached Table 2, which are owned by the plaintiffs in the above improvement zone, the local land expropriation committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City applied for adjudication. On August 25, 2017, the local land expropriation committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City determined the commencement date of expropriation as of October 20, 2017, and accepted the land, etc. to be expropriated on the basis of the commencement date of expropriation. However, pursuant to Article 30(3) of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”), the local land expropriation ruling was rendered to pay additional charges for delay for the same period as the attached Table 3’s “repayment sheet.

C. On October 25, 2018, the Central Land Expropriation Committee filed an objection against the said adjudication of expropriation. On October 25, 2018, the Central Land Expropriation Committee changed the amount of compensation for the land, etc. subject to expropriation as stated in the “amount of compensation” column in the “statement of adjudication” column in attached Table 2, and made a ruling of objection with the content of changing the amount of additional charges for delay under Article 30(3) of the Land Compensation Act as stated in attached Table 3 “the statement of late payment additional charges” as stated in attached Table 3(hereinafter “the ruling of objection”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 26 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Appraisal and assessment by a court appraiser in a case for preservation of evidence (Seoul Administrative Court No. 2018 A1275, Seoul Administrative Court No. 2018, Nov. 1281).