The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor’s summary of the grounds for appeal, it can be acknowledged that E was engaged in massage for profit without obtaining recognition of qualifications for massage as recorded in the facts charged in the instant case after E was employed by the Defendant, and the fact that the Defendant was negligent in giving due attention and supervision to prevent the act of disqualified, can also be acknowledged.

2. The lower court’s judgment 1) on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning, based on the evidence presented by the prosecutor, ordered the Defendant to employ E as a marina, or ordered the police officer who crackdowns most of customers at the time of the instant case to engage in massage.

It is difficult to recognize otherwise, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and E, without the direction of the defendant, judged that he cannot be held responsible for the act of taking custody of his body for customers, and sentenced not guilty of the facts charged in this case.

2) Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court acknowledged that E was engaged in the act of massage for profit without obtaining recognition of qualifications for massage as recorded in the instant facts charged, and that the Defendant had exercised due care and supervision to prevent the act of massage for profit as indicated in the instant facts charged.

It is also difficult to see it.

(1) There exists a fact that, consistently from an investigative agency to the original trial, E has consistently landed in the order of the title, light, bluri, and bridge at the time of the instant case, F by a crackdown police officer F

Statement is made (Evidence No. 17, 101, 103, and trial records No. 42-43). (2) At an investigative agency, E was first controlled by F when it was intended to start a telegraphic post at an investigative agency.

After the statement (refer to 15th page of the evidence record), the investigative agency and the court below reversed the statement that there is no fact that there is no fact to harm the F or to take charge of F (the evidence record on the 43th page and the trial record).