logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.11.09 2017노1062
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A 1,000,000 won, Defendant B 50,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal in the facts charged in the instant case is that the “statement of transaction” prepared by Defendant A to E E E in the original state constitutes a “statement of transaction” or “statement of transaction” under the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the ex officio judgment.

On July 10, 2018, the prosecutor maintained the previous facts charged that Defendant A prepared and ordered the F with a false statement of transactions as the primary facts charged, and applied for the amendment of a bill of amendment to the indictment containing addition of the facts charged that Defendant A issued a false statement of transactions (hereinafter referred to as “the preliminary facts charged”), and on September 17, 2018, Defendant A applied for the amendment to the indictment containing an additional statement of the facts charged that Defendant A issued a false statement of transactions and falsely prepared the relevant documents concerning the details of transactions. This court was changed on July 11, 2018 and October 19, 2018.

As examined below, this Court found the Defendant not guilty of the primary facts charged and the primary facts charged, and found the Defendant guilty of the 2 preliminary facts charged, the lower court’s judgment that only the primary facts charged was subject to the judgment could no longer be maintained.

However, the judgment of the court below has the above reasons for reversal.

In addition, the prosecutor's assertion that the prosecutor's primary facts charged are subject to the judgment of this court, and then the prosecutor's appeal as to the primary facts charged and the ancillary facts added in the trial of the party are also examined.

3. Determination

(a) Any person who falls under any of the following subparagraphs shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than three years or by a fine not exceeding 50 million won:

arrow