logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.05.27 2019고단4649
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 5, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million with fines for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court on September 5, 2013, and a summary order of KRW 6 million with fines for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ansan District Court's Ansan Branch on July 28, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 17, 2019, around 00:51, the Defendant driven a E-high-est car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.104% from the front of the convenience store in Ansan-si, the upper part of the “C” to the front part of the same Gu D, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 3 meters.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. An investigation report (a person who has filed a report, accompanied by a dynamic image closure);

1. Previous records: The application of a reply letter, such as criminal records, each disposition and reporting on the results of confirmation, shall be made;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Appointment of fines: The defendant has already been able to drive a motor vehicle twice in his/her own way after returning to his/her own country after he/she used his/her substitute driving: Provided, That since the defendant moved and parked his/her motor vehicle to his/her own country at a level of three meters after he/she returned to his/her own country, he/she seems not to have intended to drive the motor vehicle, and the actual risk of driving the motor vehicle seems to have been low, and the punishment shall be determined

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow