Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On July 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victimized person, while drinking alcohol together with the injured Party A, etc., at a D cafeteria located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, when drinking alcohol, she was frightened by the injured party E; and (b) reported that the victimized person “frighting fright” was frightened by the injured party.

“The victim’s face can be taken at a time, and the victim was faced with a dangerous object, such as tearing, etc. of treatment days, due to the injury of the victim, such as tearing, etc. of the treatment days.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph (1), Defendant A sold the victim’s face to the victim who was a dangerous object against the injury of the victim B(46) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and took care of the victim’s face with hand, breath’s finger, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written statement;

1. CCTV images and photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of a community service order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. One category (special injury) in the area of mitigation of punishment (from April to one year, and non-members of punishment) for special injury or repeated crime within the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria;

2. In the instant case for sentencing reasons, the Defendants committed an injury by exercising mutual violence, such as when the Defendants were dead on the ground of minor negligence, and prices the Defendants to be dead, etc., and in light of the content and outcome of the crime, etc., the issue is not somewhat weak, and there are many disadvantageous circumstances such as the Defendants’ records of the same punishment several times. However, the Defendants reflect the instant crime, are somewhat contingent, and there are some aspects of contingent punishment, and the age of the other Defendants, and the age of the other Defendants.