A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant, in collaboration with C, D, and E, conspired to receive insurance money or repair expenses, etc. from the personal driver insurance with which the Defendant has intentionally paid a traffic accident and then received them in advance, and D, upon loading one ton cargo vehicle owned D, has the Defendant run on the road while carrying out it on the road. C caused a traffic accident involving the above vehicle driven by the Defendant intentionally, and C, upon reporting it as a traffic accident to an insurance company, shared the role of receiving money by means of receiving insurance money, such as repair expenses, etc., by driving as if E is the owner of the above Oba, while reporting it as a traffic accident to an insurance company.

On May 6, 2010, the Defendant, C, D, and E: (a) around 22:32, the intersection where a signal, etc. is installed in front of the Jin-gun, the Jin-gun, the Jin-gun, and D, when loading F1 ton cargo vehicles, loaded “Y-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E”-, and the Defendant stops to turn to the left at the front side from the west village by driving the above cargo vehicle, but stop to turn to the front side in accordance with the new subparagraph. In this case, C, while driving the above cargo vehicle at the front side of G1 ton and waiting to the front side of the above intersection, was intentionally taken over the left part of the cargo vehicle loaded by the Defendant, and thereafter, D was merged with the victim, the insurance company of the above G cargo vehicle, and was merged with the Korea Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., the victim, the Korea Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., the victim.

E falsely reported and accepted the G vehicle by towing it to H where the Defendant works, while preparing a false confirmation letter to the victim that he/she requested the transportation of the vehicle by directly purchasing the damaged ozone part of the accident.

The Defendant, C, D, and E, as such, deceiving the employees in charge of the victim company, and deceiving them from the victim company on May 25, 2010, the Defendant and C, D, and E are KRW 1,97,00 as the repair cost for the above G freight vehicle.