The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted public organizations, etc. of violation of the Act on Entrusted Election due to the violation of the method of distributing name cards among the facts charged in the instant case, on the ground that it does not constitute a crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on “a person who conducts an election campaign in violation of the standard or allocation method of a name tag” as provided in Article 30 of the Act

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.