beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 2, 2015, the original Defendant entered into a trade agreement with the Plaintiff’s mother D (the Plaintiff’s representative) and the Defendant, on the premise that “D’s 65 million won and the Defendant’s 40 million won and invested in the same trade with the Plaintiff’s d’s KRW 65 million and the Defendant’s 40 million and the Defendant’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’ and d’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’ and d’s d’s d’, but the Defendant bears profits and monetary responsibilities. The Defendant paid KRW 3 million per month to the Defendant, and the right of D’s d’s d’s
B. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant, who entered into a lease agreement, leased the instant dan 3,000 KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 650,000, and the lease period of October 1, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), signed and sealed the instant lease agreement as a observer.
C. On March 30, 2016, the Defendant and the Defendant were the Defendant’s Intervenor C (hereinafter “C”).
(2) The Plaintiff prepared a transfer/acquisition agreement under which the entire security deposit and facilities of the instant entertainment bars are transferred for KRW 15 million (hereinafter “the transfer/acquisition agreement of March 30, 2016”).
(2) On the same day, the Defendant: (a) drafted a written agreement with the Plaintiff representing D, stating that “The Defendant will cooperate with the Defendant on May 30, 2016, on the following grounds: (b) the responsibility for civil, criminal, and administrative dispositions related to the instant dan business; (c) monthly rent and management expenses; taxes and public charges; (d) the Defendant’s investment amount is KRW 35 million on March 31, 2016; (e) KRW 5 million on April 30, 2016; and (e) KRW 7.4 million on May 30, 2016; and (e) the Defendant will cooperate with the Defendant when the certificate of seal imprint is required” (hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”).
3. On the same day, the defendant tried to enter into a normal contract with C, the building owner of the instant dan, and H, but the defendant's deposit for lease is KRW 20 million.