logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.27 2016나6428
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is engaged in gold-type manufacturing business with the trade name of “B”, and Defendant CCchopos Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant CCpos”) is a company that engages in plastic processing and recycling materials production business, etc., and Defendant Puxex Co., Ltd. is a company that manufactures and sells plastic products.

B. On July 16, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendants concluded a commodity supply contract with the following content.

(A) Certificate No. 1, 200 (hereinafter “instant contract”). ① The name of goods and the Plaintiff of the contract amount are to design and manufacture the following goods in accordance with the drawings and requirements presented by the Defendants, and to deliver the goods that passed the inspection to the Defendants.

(2) The defendants, such as submission of final drawings and the production of goods, etc., provide the plaintiff with the final drawings, specifications, and other information and data necessary for the production of the above goods, and the plaintiff shall comply with the final drawings and other directions presented by the defendants with respect to the production of the above goods, as well as with the direction of the defendants, 22,000,000,000 Hands 22,000,000 Hands 35,000,000 Hands 88,000,000,000.

(Article 3 subparag. 1). The Plaintiff must deliver the said goods to a place designated by the Defendants until August 20, 2013.

(3) The inspection Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the completion of the manufacture of the above goods at the same time, and took measures so that the Defendants can conduct the final inspection of the above goods. When the Defendants notified the Plaintiff of the passing of inspection on the said goods, the said goods shall be deemed to have passed the final inspection (Article 5 subparag. 2).

The Plaintiff’s supply of the so-called “the Plaintiff” was paid KRW 35,00,000,000 for manufacturing so-called “the Plaintiff” in accordance with the instant contract.

(C) there is no dispute.

arrow