1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (appointed party).

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, since the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the modification of Paragraph 2-B (No. 4, No. 4, and No. 5) of the judgment of the first instance (No. 5, No. 9) as stated below. 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The modified part;

B. The following circumstances acknowledged as follows, including the statement in the evidence Nos. 7, 8, 10, and 18 as to the claim against Defendant A’s fraudulent act and the entire purport of the pleadings, namely, ① retired from the National Police Hospital on April 28, 2015, and did not have income until the date of concluding the instant lease on a deposit basis, and no other real estate than the instant real estate was owned. On August 18, 2014, the 150, 126,000,000 won for appraisal of the instant real estate, and the 150,000,000 won for the establishment of a mortgage on the instant real estate as the debtor’s representative, and the 20,000 won for the establishment of a mortgage on the instant real estate as the total amount of 5 months prior to the date of the instant lease on a deposit basis, and the 20,0000 won for the Defendant to whom the Plaintiff was appointed as the creditor of the instant lease on a deposit basis of 25 months prior to the Plaintiff.