A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 13:00 on June 10, 2014, the Defendant thought that he was divorced from his wife due to the dual quality of the victim B, who is the wife of the Defendant’s South East East-dong, with drinking alcohol, and shown that he was able to look at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and that he was able to be able to be able to be able to boomed to the influent customers in this place, and the Defendant sound “if she was divorced, she was hospitalized at this place, she was hospitalized at a mental hospital,” and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by preventing the victim from responding to the customer and allowing him from having access to the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence are close to the victim, the victim was agreed with the victim, the Defendant was suffering from alcohol disorder, etc., and the Defendant committed the instant crime by contingency under the influence of alcohol, the fact that recently was administered through brain surgery, etc., and the confession of the instant crime and the depth of the instant crime shall be determined as indicated in the disposition, taking into account the following factors: