Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM5 car.

On November 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 21:02, and led D in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Seoul, to a single lane between four lanes in the distance of the office building in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, to a speed of 60km per hour.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph, after checking whether there is a person who will cut the way by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the defendant neglected to stop the vehicle auxiliary signal while proceeding, he received the victim E (the age of 16) who crosses the crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's moving direction to the left side according to the pedestrian proceeding signals, from the defendant's moving direction to the left side, and suffered about 12 weeks medical treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Sentence, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is that the defendant, while driving a motor vehicle, neglected his/her duty at the front time and caused an injury to the victim walking along the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals by violating the suspension signal, in light of the fact that the crime was committed in this case, and the degree of damage to the victim, etc., although the crime is not good, the defendant is not likely to cause any hindrance to the recovery of damage to the victim as he/she purchased a comprehensive insurance contract, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim.