1. For the plaintiff B:

A. Defendant E:6,982,204 won and its related thereto from October 25, 2015

(b) Defendant F shall be 117,399 won and .

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff A Center (hereinafter “Plaintiff Center”) is a non-corporate group registered with the Gyeonggi-do Governor pursuant to the Act on the Support for Non-Profit Residential Organizations for the purpose of its main business for self-reliance of the middle and the disabled. From February 2008, Plaintiff B is the head of the general affairs team of the Plaintiff Center, and Plaintiff D and Plaintiff B are women, who worked as the head of the secretariat of the Plaintiff Center.

B. On December 28, 2007, the Plaintiff Center was designated as a business entity supporting activities of disabled persons by the Bupyeong-si mayor.

C. Plaintiff D and Plaintiff B paid 75% of the activity subsidies to the Health and Welfare Development Institute entrusted with the above support project by Busan City, upon receiving the activity subsidies from the State and local governments, upon applying for the activity subsidies from disabled assistants. The remaining 25% from February 12, 2008 to September 28, 201 in collusion to receive the activity subsidies by applying for the activity subsidies in an unfair manner while taking charge of the work using the remaining 25% from Plaintiff Center, and the actual activity assistants did not actually provided activity subsidies to the disabled P, despite the fact that the activity assistants applied for the activity subsidies, 43,904,00 won was received on 743 occasions in total as if the activity subsidies were performed. From April 29, 2008 to October 19, 201, the actual activity assistants did not receive the activity subsidies from persons with disabilities, Q, T, U,V, N, 208 to October 10, 2018.

Plaintiff

D. Plaintiffs B and C above.

The crime of fraud, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of a falsified document, including the facts constituting the crime mentioned in paragraph (1), was prosecuted by this court, and the plaintiff D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years in one year and six months, and the plaintiff C was sentenced to a prison term of one year and six months (this Court 2012 senior group470), and the prosecutor and prosecutor.