Of the facts charged in the instant case, it is not guilty of violating the Road Traffic Act due to the failure to take measures after destroying property.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: “Defendant is a person engaged in driving of the KVA. The Defendant, around 02:10 on March 13, 2013, driven the above vehicle and changed the three-lane ahead of the KTV in the south-gu, Ulsan to two-lanes depending on the direction of the substation station. At night, the above place is an intersection with the vehicle traffic frequent, and the UV is permitted only at one lane. In this case, the driver of the vehicle is required to change the lane or the U.S., and the driver of the vehicle is required to change the direction of the vehicle in advance to the right-hand side of the vehicle, and the driver of the vehicle is obliged to take necessary measures to change the direction of the vehicle in advance to the right-hand side of the vehicle in the designated direction of the victim, and the defendant is obliged to take measures to change the two-lane distance from the designated direction of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the new direction of the victim in front of the two-lane.

2. The non-guilty part

A. The Defendant alleged that the victim was injured by his/her own vehicle and damaged the diabane that the victim driven (hereinafter “instant accident”) was not aware at that time, and thus, the Defendant’s intent of escape is the criminal intent.