A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 26, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant invaded the victim’s “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, through the entrance, into the entrance and exit to the house, and then stolen one bank equivalent to KRW 180,000 in cash and one cash equivalent to KRW 510,00 in the market value of the victim’s possession under the customer’s name, which was the victim’s ownership, and one copy of KRW 1,000 in the new world gift certificate, KRW 1,000 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 2,00 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 2,00 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 3,00 in KRW 2,00 in KRW 3,00 in KRW 3,00 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 1,00 in KRW 250 in the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of damaged articles and attachment of photographs), investigation reports (specific objects for damaged articles) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act recognize and reflects the Defendant’s mistake, the Defendant agreed with the victim and the victim does not want the Defendant’s punishment, the degree of damage, the circumstances of the instant crime, and the criminal records of the Defendant, etc.,