A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2014, at least 19:50, the Defendant was asked of the police officer D belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station C district unit of Seoul Western Police Station, who was called up after receiving 112 reports from the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 400 subway 6 subway lines, and was asked of questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the police officer D, who was called up on November 10, 201, and the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties on the handling of 112 reports, when he was placed at the left side of D with one hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reasons for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the overall sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment; and (b) the recommended sentence specified in the sentencing guidelines shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account

The Defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case and is in profoundly against the Defendant.

B. On June 13, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine on more than six occasions by Seoul Southern District Court due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Offences against Drivers, etc.).

C. The dismissal of public prosecution that has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) set forth in the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommendation) for the obstruction of performance of official duties

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: “The Defendant assaulted the victim’s head and face with her hand on the ground that the victim E, who is another passenger, was able to do so, while taking a large amount of sound in the 6-line subway train that moves from the egrasium located in Mapo-gu Seoul Changdong around November 10, 201 to the Cheongdong Station, the Defendant 19:30 on November 19, 2014.”

2. This part of the judgment.