Defendant

D. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant D’s criminal records] On November 27, 2014, he/she was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents at the Daegu District Court on February 12, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2015. Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on November 27, 2014 and two years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2014.

[2] The Defendant: (a) delegated the sales contract to ED for the sales promotion and contract guidance to the company in Nam-si, the company in charge of the Gyeonggi-si, the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge of the company in charge

1. On October 18, 2010, in accordance with the above public offering, a fraud against the victim O means that "the victimO has good land in Q Q Q Q Q, which is expected and located in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Inc., may develop the land with a high prospect, location, and the land with a house for power generation, which shall be subject to individual registration." On October 18, 2010, the victim showed that the land was the subject of a contract to sell and purchase. On October 18, 2010, the victim and the forest of this case entered into a contract with the victim for sale of approximately KRW 1210,000,000,000,0000,000 from the forest of this case (each map).

However, in fact, the land subject to this contract was located on the ridge line without access, which was different from the land actually shown to the victim, and it was not possible to develop the land with the land for electric power generation, and there was no individual registration.

The Defendant, in collusion with A, deceives the victim and is subject to such deception.