A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the homeland reserve forces belonging to the 3585 Army units, the 3585 army units.

1. On October 25, 2016, the Defendant received the second supplementary training (30H) for 16 years from the training site of the local reserve forces located in the Dong-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, and from November 14 through 18, 2016, from the Defendant’s house located in Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and received the second supplementary training (30H) for 16 years from the training site of the local reserve forces located in the Dong-gu, Seoan-gu.

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

2. On November 7, 2016, the Defendant received a notice of convening a local reserve force training in the name of the 3585 unit commander of the Army, for the following reasons: “On November 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; and (b) at the local reserve forces training site located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; and (c) 14 years, from the local reserve forces training site located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu; and (d) the Defendant received a

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 15(9)1 and Article 6(1)1 of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces for the Establishment of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and each of the choice of a sentence (Amended by Act No. 14184, May 29, 201); Articles 15(9)1 and 6(1)1 of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The suspension of execution of sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, which repeatedly participated in training even if a fine was imposed several times for the same kind of crime with the same reason for sentencing, is against the fact that the sentence is determined as ordered by taking into account the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant trial proceedings.