A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 9, 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act against a juvenile victim, such as assaulting the victim’s right chest with the victim’s knife hand during the period of playing games at around 13:00, the Dong-gu building and the three-story singing room at around 16, 2017, in which around 13:00, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, such as assaulting the victim’s right chest with the victim’s knife hand and raising the victim.

2. The defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the act of similarity) at around 16:00 the same day as paragraph (1) of the same Article, the victim's part in his/her singing room 20, where he/she talks with the victim to inform him/her of his/her clothes during his/her singing and talks with the victim, puts his/her finger into the part of the victim's own victim's hand, and talks the victim's chest. When the victim refuses to do so, he/she forced the victim to cut his/her son's son with his/her hand, forced the victim to cut his/her son's son, cut his/her son's son's son's son, and prevented the victim from suffering with his/her body in his/her shock with his/her shock.

Sheed, snife, or feld.

“In doing so, the victim’s panty was forced off, and the victim was sexually raped by inserting her fingers into the part of the victim’s panty, and inserting her fingers in several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Videos of video recording CDs made by the victim's statement;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel found the defendant guilty of the content of the E message that the defendant and the victim divided, while the crime No. 1 is committed, it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant committed the act of similarity because the defendant's statement was not reliable on the ground that the defendant's statement was not reliable, on the ground that the defendant's act of similarity is not consistent, because it is not possible to capture him by one hand due to the defendant's interference with the defendant's hand, as to paragraph 2, the structure of the singing outside the crime scene, and CCTV inside the singing room is operated, and the CCTV inside the singing room is operated, and the defendant's statement is not consistent.