logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.29 2015가단64314
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) On February 7, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sublease contract with Defendant A, the Korean Federation of Arts and Culture Organizations (hereinafter “Nonindicted Corporation”) which is a non-party incorporated as a broker of Defendant A (hereinafter “Nonindicted Corporation”).

(2) The building owned by Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”)

1) As to 1707, Nonparty C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”)

(1) The sub-lease contract (hereinafter referred to as the “sub-lease contract of this case”) and the deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,300,000 (excluding value-added tax), and the period from February 12, 2014 to February 11, 2015, shall be determined as the sub-lease contract of this case.

(2) Article 2(2) of the instant sub-lease agreement provides that “The sub-lessee has confirmed that the sub-contractor has been granted the power to sublease from the owner.”

3. On February 7, 2014, the Plaintiff transferred the down payment of KRW 3,00,000,000 to the non-party company, and received all the deposit money for the instant sub-lease contract by transferring KRW 27,00,000 on February 12, 2014.

B. On April 18, 2012, the non-party corporation, which was a judgment related to the termination of a lease agreement, succeeds to the rights and obligations of the lease deposit amounting to KRW 10 billion with the non-party corporation, the non-party corporation, the non-party corporation, the non-party corporation, the non-party corporation, and the non-party corporation, the non-party corporation, the CK group, etc., and the whole building of the building of this case, (hereinafter

After the conclusion of the lease contract, only a part of the above lease deposit was paid and possessed and used the building in this case. However, the non-party corporation notified the payment of the remainder of the lease deposit after the agreed date, but the non-party corporation failed to perform it, and the non-party corporation declared the termination of the lease contract with the non-party company by document proving the contents of the lease contract on January 28, 2014.

"On the ground that it filed a lawsuit for delivery of a building and rendered a judgment in favor of all of the pleadings on July 5, 2014, the judgment above is around that time.

arrow