logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.01.28 2018가단228827
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant C, Defendant D, E, and F jointly with the above Defendant, whichever are 4,6560,000 won and above.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 31, 2014, Defendant C, the crime of Defendant C, established the GG, which is the most similar and similar receiving organization, as a legitimate “real estate sales agency,” and concealed its status by employing Defendant F as a representative in the name of the company, by taking partial charge of the business affairs of the company, and by taking partial charge of the business affairs of the company, by employing Defendant D, E, etc., and by taking partial charge of the business affairs of the company, and by taking out a false loan or investment from investors, including the Plaintiff, as follows.

On March 10, 2017, Defendant C, who pretended to invest in real estate, made a false statement to the effect that “If Defendant C lends funds necessary for the investment in real estate, such as apartment and officetel, it would pay the principal in full after one year after paying interest on the second part of each month.”

However, the above company did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and interest to the plaintiff according to the agreement, as it is not possible to return the plaintiff's investment funds to the senior investor's profits due to a fund-raising organization established without any particular profit-making structure.

Nevertheless, as seen above, Defendant C, by deceiving the Plaintiff, obtained KRW 10 million from the Plaintiff as a loan money, and acquired it by deception, and agreed to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of principal or an amount exceeding it in the future by the same method from June 2, 2016 to January 17, 2018, and imported the investment money without delay.

On April 25, 2017, Defendant C, which pretended to conduct redevelopment projects, developed so-called so-called “in-depth goods related to the redevelopment project site in Busan Dong-gu H Dong-dong.” The purport of Defendant C’s investment of KRW 50 million per Gu-dong, would pay three times the amount of investment after a year through the purchase of the site for redevelopment.”

arrow