logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.11.24 2020고단105
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 500,000 from the Cheongju District Court to a fine of KRW 500,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine in the same court on February 18, 2009, respectively.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle B.

On December 13, 2019, at around 01:40, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol with 0.158% of alcohol concentration 0.158%, and led to a shooting distance of 34 o-lane 6, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Cheongju-si, to proceed to the dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and left side well and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim C, who was under a stop signal due to the negligence of neglecting this, and was driven by the victim C, as the front part of the said Ecoos car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence.

2. On November 15, 2019, the Defendant driven a B-coo vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 200 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.158% from the 200-meter section to the private road located in the 6-lane 34, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Seowon-si, Cheongju-si, to drive a e-coo vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.158%.

As a result, the Defendant violated the provision on the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A survey report on the actual condition and a medical certificate;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control, and letter of request for appraisal;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and summary orders, and other Acts and subordinate statutes applicable;

arrow