logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.05.15 2018가단105101
추심금
Text

1. The Defendant calculated the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 31,90,000 and the annual rate of KRW 15% per annum from February 15, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Lease contract and sublease contract 1) The Plaintiff is the owner of the building of the second floor of the building with the brick slock slock slock slock slock slock slock slock slocks in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul. On March 15, 2014, the Plaintiff is the owner of the building of the second floor of the building.

2,200,000 won (including value-added tax) per month for the lease (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”)

(2) On April 6, 2016, the Plaintiff notified E of the termination of the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the delinquency in rent.

3) However, on July 8, 2016, the Defendant concluded a sublease contract with the content that the instant store was set at KRW 11.5 million as lease deposit and KRW 2.5 million per month as lease deposit (hereinafter “the instant sublease contract”).

(B) On August 24, 2017, the Plaintiff concluded a request for the delivery of the instant store, etc. with the Seoul Central District Court 2016Da5273690 on the ground that the Plaintiff was the former lessee without permission, and was rendered a favorable judgment on November 24, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

(2) In addition, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against E and the Defendant seeking the payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 2,200,000 per month from July 15, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the said store, by filing a lawsuit against E and the Defendant seeking the payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 2.2 million per month from July 31, 2017 (the Defendant deemed to have been a confession; hereinafter referred to as “related judgment”).

(1) Upon receipt of the foregoing judgment, the said judgment became final and conclusive (hereinafter referred to as “second lawsuit”).

C. The Plaintiff is a certified copy of the judgment related to the seizure and collection order.

arrow