The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (limited to six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 120 hours of community service order) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is likely to lead to the instant crime contingent, reflects the depth of the instant crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the suspension of qualification.

However, the crime of this case is not likely to obstruct the execution of official duties by assaulting a police officer dispatched after receiving a report.

In addition, the defendant has been punished twice for violent crimes.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.