The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing business operations at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 2, 2018.

On October 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) after drinking and drinking alcohol in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, “C,” around October 23:0, 2017; (b) on the ground that the victim D would pay the drinking value; (c) on the ground that the victim’s neck was 1, 1, and 2, 1,000 abstinced, and 2,000 abstinced, and 23:00 abstinced, “for the same year, fluent year, fluent fri, fluent fri

The term "the victim's work was obstructed by the threat of 30 minutes, such as avoiding disturbance and preventing visitors who had entered the place."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the criminal place

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exempted Criminal Act (i.e., the crime of interference with the duties in the judgment, in light of the details of the crime of interference with the duties in the judgment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the crime of interference with the instant duties, even if the judgment was rendered at the same time with the said crime, it is not deemed that the punishment was excessive, and thus, the punishment