1. The plaintiff's claim that the court changed in exchange is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

(4) A. 1-2 of evidence 1 (hereinafter referred to as "no.S.) - Contract Date: - No. 300 million won: E Yang stable - Construction cost: April 15, 2013; and May 30, 2013: - The contractor’s seal is written as a rehabilitation company and affixed on the seal of the rehabilitation company at the end of the defendant’s representative; 5 billion won (hereinafter referred to as “n.e., No. 500, Apr. 15, 2013 - The name of the Corporation: 300,000,000 won for each other; 200,000,000 won for intermediate payment (including 7:5,000,000 won for each other); 30,000,000 won for intermediate payment (including 1.0,000 won for intermediate payment).

A. In order to operate a fish farm in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the rehabilitation company awarded a contract to the Plaintiff, a construction business entity, for the construction business entity, for the construction business of an official residence and the construction business of an official residence (hereinafter “instant construction”).

In the process, several contracts for the instant construction works were prepared, and the main contents and features of each contract are as follows.

B. During the process of performing the instant construction project, the Plaintiff stated that the Defendant, a total of KRW 332 million from July 2013 to January 2014, 2017, stated that the amount of the loan was no dispute over the facts causing 332 million in the first preparatory date for pleading on March 3, 2017, but the said statement in the preparatory document dated March 7, 2018 and April 3, 2018, withdrawn as the holder of the right.

In addition, even if the confession is a confession during the trial, it is against the truth and the confession is made by mistake, so the confession is revoked.

However, the foregoing.