A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2017, the Defendant is clear that the “C. 19.1.1.9” of the facts charged is a clerical error, and thus, it is recognized ex officio. At around 17:20, Seoul, upon receiving a report from 112, the Defendant called the “D” restaurant located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, upon taking protective measures to the police officer F, etc. belonging to the Eunpyeong Police Station E Zone, was called the Defendant on the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and then on the front road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant was able to take measures to protect the police officer F, etc. belonging to the Eunpyeong Police Station E Zone, and came back to the front seat of the F. 1.2.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and protective measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to cover booms video images;

1. The punishment shall be determined in consideration of the circumstances that are favorable to the fact that there is no (a person with a special sentencing sentencing) in the basic area (from June to January 6) (a person with a sentencing sentencing) (a person with a special sentencing sentencing) of the type 1 (from June to January 6), the basic area (a person with a sentencing sentencing) (a person with a special sentencing sentencing) of the type of crime, the degree of assault is not less than that of the crime, and there is no record of punishment several times for the same kind of crime, and the reason for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommending punishment] of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the punishment of the same kind;