logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.12.24 2014가단928
건물명도
Text

1. Defendant B:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in Attachment 1;

(b) 2,160,000 won and its corresponding;

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 25, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B, setting the lease deposit at KRW 15,000,000 for the real estate listed in the [Attachment List No. 1 (hereinafter “701”) from July 1, 2012 to July 11, 2013 for the period from July 201, 2013, and KRW 1,300,000 for the rent (the 12th day of each month for the rent). ② On February 20, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with respect to the real estate listed in the [Attachment List No. 2 (hereinafter “No. 702”), with the period from February 1, 2012 to July 11, 2012; and the lease agreement at KRW 15,000 for each month as of February 20, 2012.

Even after the expiration of the above lease agreement, it has been impliedly renewed with the same content as the above contract, and the defendant B occupies 701 and 702 until now.

B. On November 1, 2010, between Defendant C and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is “No. 703 of the real estate listed in the [Attachment List No. 3].

(C) As to the lease deposit, the lease contract was concluded at KRW 10,00,00 from November 12, 2010 to July 11, 2012, and KRW 550,000 per month (payment date of rent) with regard to the lease deposit. Even after the expiration of the above lease contract, the above contract was an implied renewal, and Defendant C has occupied KRW 703 until December 2013. (c) The delayed rent of KRW 701 until December 2013 is KRW 17,730,00,000, and the delayed rent of KRW 702-2 is KRW 15,730,00,000, and KRW 703. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, through the copy of the complaint of this case, served each of the above Defendants on the grounds of the cancellation of the lease contract, and the purport of the complaint of this case was as follows. (5,130,000,000.

2. According to the above findings of the determination as to the cause of the claim, each of the above lease agreements was lawfully terminated and terminated.

Therefore, barring any special circumstance, Defendant B shall be the Plaintiff, and Defendant B shall be the same.

arrow