logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.11.08 2017가단52823
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants were vice versa; from March 1997 to December 2, 2016, Defendant C served in the tax accountant office operated by the Plaintiff from January 2010 to September 2015 (hereinafter “instant office”).

Meanwhile, from around 2000, the Plaintiff worked as the secretary at the instant office from around 2000.

B. Around March 1997, the Plaintiff opened the instant office, and Defendant B, as a member of the establishment of the instant office, worked as the head of the office or office (D membership and the head of the office, and Defendant B served as the head of the office) at the instant office, and has been in charge of overall business affairs of the instant office, including business partners management, receipts and disbursements, business partners security, personnel management, receipts and disbursements, and reporting duties of the National Tax Service.

C. From around 2011, the Plaintiff was paid KRW 5,50,000 as monthly fixed pay at the instant office, and only managed the passbook of the instant office, and Defendant B was in exclusive charge of all the affairs, including the operation of the instant office and the management of transaction parties.

Around October 2015, Defendant C opened a tax accountant C office (hereinafter referred to as “C office”), and around October 31, 2015, Defendant C registered 16 businesses, including E Co., Ltd., a business partner, who was a business partner, at the instant office, as the business partner of the C office after the contract was revoked, and registered as the business partner of the C office on November 1, 2015.

E. The management of authorized certificates used in the instant office and the computer accounting program data of the instant office was entirely in charge of D, the Plaintiff’s children, and Defendant C, a 36 E, a stock company, etc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant companies”) that changed from the customer of the instant office stored in D’s computer to the customer of the C office.

arrow