logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2015.10.14 2015고정78
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:08, at the C hotel Lane located in Si-si B, the victim D (14 years of age) who had undergone field experience studies did not grow down and returned to their friendships (22:0 years of age) and demanded the victim to find out the appearance, and stop it. As the victim did not implement it, the Defendant used the victim, such as raising the victim’s knife and knife the victim’s knife one time with his knife and knife each by hand, as he did not perform it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each written statement prepared D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (specific relation to the date and time of committing crimes A), investigation reports (CCTV verification);

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant only lives as a citizen of the victim by drinking, and there is no fact that prices the victim's ship as stated in the facts constituting the crime, and even if the defendant's act is considered as an assault.

Even though the defendant alleged to the effect that the act constitutes a justifiable act because he committed an assault to the victim's saves, the defendant's saves of the victim's saves. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the defendant was found to have committed an assault on the part of the victim's saves, etc. Furthermore, in full view of the details, motive, means, methods, and results of the instant case acknowledged by each of the above evidence, it is difficult to deem that the student, including the victim, has the right to discipline the defendant in charge of the pre-contracts in the set of accommodation with the victim's saves, etc., and it is difficult to view that the act

arrow