logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.09.18 2015고단165
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2014, at around 10:30 on August 25, 2014, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim F (n, 47 years of age) who is female employees at “E” restaurant operated by the Defendant, “FC will come out of the young and high water, panty will come out with panty, and will be good when fright will come out with her husband.” The Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim’s her husband on several occasions.

2. At around 19:00 on September 3, 2014, the Defendant committed an indecent act by hand by rhing the victim’s right shoulder, drawing up his/her shoulder, string his/her side and her mackt on several occasions, and routing his/her part into the victim’s side mack.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of F and G in each of the above legal statements (the defendant and his defense counsel did not act like the facts charged). However, considering the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, the defendant's assertion is not accepted since the facts charged in this case are recognized. ① The victim's statement is consistent with the main part of the facts charged in this case, and the victim's insult around August 30, 2014, which was accused by the victim as of August 30, 2014, (a) the victim's insult (it is not possible for the defendant to take advantage of his body in the garden) (a time after one year, G was stated that he was in the same G in the present garden, and at that time, G was credibility in the victim's statement, such as the victim's statement that he made his body and made sexual remarks from the victim.

② Although the victim’s de facto marriage filed a complaint with the Defendant as a monetary problem in the course of resolving the relationship between the Defendant and the said spouse, it may also be viewed that the victim could have filed a complaint with the Defendant only when the said spouse terminated the relationship with the Defendant.

arrow