Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2015, at around 23:20, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force by driving a disturbance within the main point of view, i.e., “E” operated by the victim D of the victim D in the Seosung-si of Gyeonggi-do, with the drinking value problem within the entertainment main point, and by cutting the two main disease in the display site into the floor by cutting the string of the string of the string, thereby avoiding disturbance within the main point of view.

2. On August 27, 2015, at around 23:25, the Defendant: (a) was unable to avoid disturbance due to the scambling of the alcohol price at the entertainment drinking room as above; (b) Gman, who was called to the site after receiving a report, and (c) Gman, who was called to the site at the F District Police Station of the Sungdong-dong Police Station; and (d) Haman, who was informed of the details of the report against the above harbor proprietor; and (b) the said G, etc. committed assaulting the Defendant by resisting the defect in order to arrest the Defendant as the current offender interfering with his/her duties; and (c) scambling and scaming him/her.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. Data from victims and on-site photographs;

1. Application of statutes on field CCTV photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with the performance of official duties) concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the form and content of the instant crime, the intent of the victims to punish the instant crime. Considering favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant reflects his/her mistake, and the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment, the background leading up to the instant crime, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, health conditions, and the background leading up to the instant crime.