The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (1.5 million won of a fine) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is deeply divided into and reflects the defendant's mistake, and the defendant seems to have considerably difficult economic situation such as living together with children who are engaged in daily work in the absence of any particular import situation, and the defendant also has some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the age of 71 years old, which is not adequate for the current state of health due to the merger of urology, etc. However, the act of transferring the means of access, such as the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, not only damages the safety and reliability of electronic financial transactions, but also harms society by using the so-called Bosinging, etc., which are many victims who actually transferred, and causes damage by using the passbook in such crime. The defendant was subject to suspension of indictment for the same crime of this case around 2013, and there are other unfavorable circumstances such as the motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the character and conduct of the defendant, and the environment of the defendant, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.