logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고정136
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. No person summary of the facts charged shall lend any means of electronic financial transactions to any third person;

On March 28, 2018, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who was not the deceased’s name to grant three million won when he/she lent his/her physical card through text messages for three days, and accepted it. In front of the Defendant’s office in the Government-Si of the Government of the Republic of Korea in the same Gyeonggi-gu, the Defendant sent his/her physical card, each of which is linked to the Defendant’s Saemaul Cooperative Account (Account Number C) and the new bank account (Account Number D) to the designated address by the person who was not the deceased’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access.

2. According to the records of this case, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won on October 13, 2018, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 13, 2018, and the defendant was issued a proposal to request the defendant to send a e-mail card from his nameless person through a mobile phone on March 5, 2018. On April 2, 2018, the defendant sent the e-mail card of the account of community credit cooperatives (Account Number C) opened in the name of the defendant to his nameless person through the e-mail delivery from G located in the e-government CityF on April 2, 2018, and sent the e-mail card to the e-mailed person through the e-mail account of community credit cooperatives (Account Number C) in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the e-mail lending of the e-mail card from the e-mail bank account of this case to the e-mail bank account of this case (D).

It is recognized that the statement was stated "....."

According to the above facts of recognition, this case is examined.

arrow